Lobkovich No-BS OKRs Framework

Transform vague strategic ambitions into a focused, measurable OKR set that drives real clarity, alignment, and progress — without the corporate fluff.

// TL;DR

The Lobkovich No-BS OKRs Framework is a goal-setting method that turns vague strategic ambitions into a focused, measurable set of Objectives and Key Results — without corporate fluff. Created by strategist Sara Lobkovich, it separates directional Objectives (what matters and why) from measurable Key Results across three types: Outcome, Progress, and Target Behavior. Use it whenever a team, individual, or organisation sets goals for a quarter, year, or 90-day sprint — especially when prior goal-setting produced confusion, overwhelm, or a laundry list of metrics nobody acts on. It prioritises judicious focus over comprehensive coverage.

// When should you use the Lobkovich No-BS OKRs framework?

Use this skill whenever a team, individual, or organisation needs to set goals for a quarter or annual cycle, especially when prior goal-setting has produced confusion, overwhelm, or a laundry list of metrics that nobody acts on.

// What do you need before writing your OKRs?

  • Team or role contextrequired
    Who is setting the OKRs? (e.g., product team, creative team, individual strategist, whole organisation)
  • Goal cyclerequired
    What time period are these OKRs for? (e.g., Q2, annual, 90-day sprint)
  • Strategic challenge or focus arearequired
    What is the team wrestling with or trying to move the needle on this cycle? Describe the current situation, key tensions, and what 'winning' looks like.
  • Available data signals
    What metrics, surveys, or behavioural signals does the team already track or could start tracking?
  • Known constraints or burnout/compression risks
    Any organisational pressures, resource limits, or sustainability concerns that should shape the OKRs.

// What are the core principles behind No-BS OKRs?

Objectives answer 'What's most important and why does it matter?'

An objective is not a task list or a metric — it is an ambitious statement of shared purpose that gives direction and focus for the goal cycle. It must carry a 'why' so the team can align to it in how they work, not just what they deliver.

Key Results describe outcomes and progress, not activity

Key results are aspirational, objectively measurable targets. They never describe what the team will do — they describe what will be measurably true if the work is succeeding. Activity belongs in a project plan, not an OKR.

The Three Key Result Types (Outcome / Progress / Target Behavior)

Every OKR set should include: at least one Outcome Key Result (a big-impact goal the team influences but does not fully control), at least one Progress Key Result (a measurable process improvement that supports the outcome), and where data is thin, a Target Behavior Key Result (counting spontaneous qualitative signals that indicate directional success).

Judicious prioritisation over comprehensive coverage

No-BS OKRs are deliberately few. Teams do not set goals about everything they could measure — they surface only the goals that will create genuine clarity and focus about what is truly most important to move the needle this cycle.

Theme as a clarity anchor

Each OKR set is named with a short, crystal-clear keyword phrase (the Theme) that instantly communicates the territory this objective and its key results occupy. The theme is a navigational tool, not a title.

Target-rich vs. data-sparse environments

Teams with abundant data (sales, marketing, engineering) face a mindset challenge in selecting the right few measures. Teams with thin data (creative, strategy, HR) should lean on Target Behavior Key Results to instrument what matters before richer metrics exist.

Influence, not control

Teams are not required to have full control over a key result for it to be valid. If knowing the goal shapes daily decisions and prioritisation, the goal is doing its job — even if external factors affect the final number.

// How do you build a No-BS OKR set step by step?

  1. 1

    Identify the Theme

    Choose a short keyword phrase (2–4 words) that names the strategic territory this OKR set addresses. Examples: 'Product and Customer Experience', 'Creative Sustainability', 'Revenue Growth'. The theme should be instantly recognisable to anyone on the team and should reflect the core tension or opportunity for this cycle.

  2. 2

    Draft the Objective

    Write an ambitious statement of shared purpose using the formula: [Action] + [what you are creating/achieving] + [why it matters / what it enables]. The objective must be directional and inspirational, not measurable. Test it against the question: 'Does this tell us what's most important AND why it matters?' If it reads like a metric or a to-do item, rewrite it. Avoid weak verbs like 'support' or 'help' — use strong directional verbs like 'create', 'establish', 'transform', 'build'.

  3. 3

    Draft the Outcome Key Result

    Identify the single most important measurable outcome that would signal this objective is being achieved. Format: [Metric] + [direction] + [magnitude] + [from X to Y] + [by when]. Example: 'Increase weekly active user retention by 30 points from 45% to 70% within 90 days of launch.' This should feel ambitious — the team influences it but may not fully control it. That tension is intentional and healthy.

  4. 4

    Draft the Progress Key Result

    Identify one measurable process or workflow improvement that, if achieved, would meaningfully support the Outcome Key Result. This is not the big outcome — it is a leading indicator or enabler. Format follows the same [metric] + [from X to Y] + [by when] structure. Example: 'Decrease average user path to value completion from seven clicks to three clicks by end of Q2.' Ask: 'If we hit this, does it make the outcome more likely?'

  5. 5

    Draft the Target Behavior Key Result (if applicable)

    If the team lacks instrumented data for a signal that matters, identify a behaviour or spontaneous feedback pattern that can be counted. Format: 'Increase/decrease the frequency of [specific observable behaviour or verbatim signal] from [X] to [Y] per [time unit].' Example: 'Increase frequency of users spontaneously mentioning ease of use or intuitive in product feedback from zero to five per week.' This key result builds the measurement muscle before richer metrics exist. Use it when you are in a data-sparse environment.

  6. 6

    Stress-test the full OKR set

    Run the following checks: (1) Does the objective answer 'what's most important and why does it matter?' — not just what? (2) Do ALL key results describe outcomes or progress, with zero activity or output language? (3) Is the set small enough to create genuine focus — not a list of everything the team cares about? (4) Are the key results objectively measurable — could two different people observing the same data agree on whether the target was hit? (5) Does the set feel ambitious but not fabricated? If any check fails, revise before finalising.

  7. 7

    Confirm the goal cycle and assign the OKR set

    State explicitly which cycle (quarter, year, 90-day sprint) this OKR set governs. Confirm team ownership. The OKR should then move from slides into everyday operations and decisions — it is a working tool, not a planning artefact. Schedule regular check-ins where the key results are reviewed against current data and inform prioritisation decisions.

// What do strong No-BS OKR sets look like in practice?

A product team launching a new iteration of a digital tool, historically plagued by user drop-off due to friction in the experience.

Theme: Product and Customer Experience. Objective: Create a friction-free product experience that delights users and makes them eager to return, establishing a foundation for sustainable growth and engagement. Outcome KR: Improve weekly active user retention by 30 points from 45% to 70% within 90 days of launch. Progress KR: Decrease average user path to value completion from seven steps to three steps by end of Q2. Target Behavior KR: Increase frequency of users spontaneously describing the product as easy or intuitive in feedback from zero to five mentions per week.

A creative services team delivering client work at high quality but experiencing team burnout and inconsistent referral rates.

Theme: Creative Sustainability. Objective: Balance delivering remarkable client work with nurturing the team's creative energy so the team can bring head-turning creative to clients without burning out. Outcome KR: Increase new client inquiries via referrals by four per month from two to six. Progress KR: Increase client successfulness score on pulse surveys by 10 points from 60% to 70% favourable. Target Behavior KR: Improve the team's bi-weekly internal average energy score by two points from 6 to 8 (on the team's self-assessment energy scoring model).

An HR team wanting to improve onboarding quality but lacking robust historical data.

Theme: Onboarding Excellence. Objective: Build an onboarding experience that makes new hires feel genuinely equipped and welcomed so they contribute meaningfully faster and stay longer. Outcome KR: Improve 90-day new hire retention rate from 72% to 88% by end of year. Progress KR: Reduce average time-to-first-meaningful-contribution from 45 days to 28 days by Q3. Target Behavior KR: Increase the frequency of new hires proactively reaching out to connect with cross-functional colleagues in their first 30 days from two instances per cohort to eight per cohort.

// What mistakes should you avoid when writing OKRs?

  • Setting key results that describe activity or outputs (what the team will do) rather than outcomes or progress (what will be measurably true as a result). If a key result starts with 'conduct', 'run', 'hold', or 'deliver', it is almost certainly an activity, not a key result.
  • Creating too many OKRs or too many key results per objective — this destroys the focus that makes No-BS OKRs work. More goals is not more strategy; it is less clarity.
  • Writing objectives that are already measurable — objectives should be directional and purpose-driven, not metric-based. Measurability belongs entirely in the key results.
  • Skipping the 'why it matters' component of the objective, leaving the team with direction but no shared sense of purpose or meaning to align to.
  • Treating OKRs as a planning slide exercise rather than a living operational tool that informs daily decisions and prioritisation throughout the cycle.
  • Avoiding Target Behavior Key Results because the signal feels 'soft' — in data-sparse environments, counting observable behaviours is a legitimate and powerful measurement approach.
  • Assuming teams must have full control over a key result for it to be valid — influence is sufficient if the goal shapes how the team makes decisions.

// What are the key terms in the No-BS OKRs framework?

No-BS OKRs
Sara Lobkovich's flavour of the OKR methodology, designed for organisations wired for systemic change and innovation — stripping away bureaucratic implementation patterns to focus on genuine clarity, focus, and alignment.
Objective
An ambitious statement of shared purpose that gives direction and focus for the current goal cycle. Answers 'what's most important and why does it matter?' — directional, not measurable.
Key Result
An aspirational, objectively measurable target that clarifies the team's most important success and progress measures. Describes outcomes and progress, never activity.
Theme
A short keyword phrase (2–4 words) assigned to an OKR set to provide an instant, crystal-clear signal of the strategic territory the objective and key results address.
Outcome Key Result
A key result measuring a significant end-state the team is aiming for — ambitious, influenced by the team's work but not fully within their control.
Progress Key Result
A key result measuring a specific process or workflow improvement that serves as a leading indicator or enabler of the Outcome Key Result.
Target Behavior Key Result
A key result that counts the frequency of specific observable behaviours or spontaneous qualitative signals — used when instrumented business metrics do not yet exist for an important dimension of success.
Goal cycle
The defined time period an OKR set governs — typically a quarter or a year, sometimes a 90-day sprint.
Target-rich environment
A part of the business (e.g., sales, marketing, engineering) with abundant existing data, making metric selection plentiful but requiring mindset discipline to choose only the most important few.
Compression zone
The organisational position of teams (e.g., product) caught between competing stakeholder demands — customer needs versus internal technical or operational constraints — making goal-setting especially complex.
Energy scoring model
A self-assessment practice where team members rate their own energy or capacity on a defined scale, used as a Target Behavior Key Result to track team sustainability alongside client-facing outcomes.

// FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

What is the No-BS OKRs framework?

The No-BS OKRs framework is Sara Lobkovich's version of the OKR methodology, designed to strip away bureaucratic implementation patterns and focus on genuine clarity, focus, and alignment. It separates directional Objectives (what's most important and why) from measurable Key Results, using three types — Outcome, Progress, and Target Behavior — and deliberately keeps the goal set small so it drives real decisions rather than becoming a planning slide.

What is the difference between an objective and a key result?

An objective is an ambitious statement of shared purpose that gives direction and answers 'what's most important and why does it matter?' — it is directional, not measurable. A key result is an objectively measurable target describing what will be true if the work is succeeding. Objectives inspire; key results prove progress. Measurability belongs entirely in the key results, never in the objective.

How do I write a good OKR objective?

Use the formula [Action] + [what you are creating or achieving] + [why it matters]. Pick strong directional verbs like 'create', 'establish', or 'transform' — avoid weak ones like 'support' or 'help'. Test it against the question: 'Does this tell us what's most important AND why?' If it reads like a metric or a to-do item, rewrite it. Objectives should inspire and direct, not measure.

How do I know if my key result is actually an outcome and not an activity?

Check the opening verb: if it starts with 'conduct', 'run', 'hold', or 'deliver', it's an activity and belongs in a project plan, not an OKR. A true key result describes what will be measurably true as a result of the work — using the format [metric] + [direction] + [from X to Y] + [by when]. Ask whether two observers looking at the same data would agree the target was hit.

What are the three types of key results in No-BS OKRs?

The three types are Outcome, Progress, and Target Behavior Key Results. An Outcome KR measures a big end-state the team influences but doesn't fully control. A Progress KR measures a process improvement that's a leading indicator for the outcome. A Target Behavior KR counts observable behaviours or spontaneous signals when instrumented data doesn't yet exist. Every OKR set should ideally include at least one Outcome and one Progress KR.

How does No-BS OKRs compare to traditional OKRs?

No-BS OKRs strips away the bureaucratic implementation patterns that bloat traditional OKRs — like cascading goals about everything or treating OKRs as planning slides. It emphasises judicious prioritisation over comprehensive coverage, adds the Target Behavior Key Result for data-sparse teams, and insists objectives stay directional (never measurable). The result is fewer, sharper goals that function as living operational tools rather than quarterly paperwork.

When should I use the No-BS OKRs framework?

Use it whenever a team, individual, or organisation needs to set goals for a quarter, year, or 90-day sprint — especially when past goal-setting produced confusion, overwhelm, or a list of metrics nobody acts on. It's ideal when you need to focus a team on what truly matters this cycle rather than tracking everything you could possibly measure.

Do I need full control over a key result for it to be valid?

No — influence is sufficient. If knowing the goal shapes your team's daily decisions and prioritisation, the key result is doing its job even when external factors affect the final number. This tension between ambition and control is intentional and healthy. Demanding full control usually produces timid, uninspiring goals that don't move the needle.

What is a Target Behavior Key Result and when do I use it?

A Target Behavior Key Result counts the frequency of specific observable behaviours or spontaneous qualitative signals — for example, 'Increase users spontaneously calling the product intuitive from zero to five mentions per week.' Use it in data-sparse environments like creative, strategy, or HR teams, where instrumented business metrics don't yet exist. It builds your measurement muscle before richer metrics are available.

What results can I expect from using No-BS OKRs?

Expect sharper focus, clearer alignment, and goals that actually inform daily decisions rather than sitting on a slide. Teams typically escape the 'laundry list of metrics' trap and converge on the few outcomes that genuinely move the needle this cycle. Because objectives carry a 'why', teams align on how they work, not just what they deliver — reducing confusion and overwhelm.

How many OKRs should a team set per cycle?

Deliberately few. No-BS OKRs prioritise judicious selection over comprehensive coverage — teams surface only the goals that create genuine clarity about what's most important this cycle. More goals is not more strategy; it's less clarity. A tight set with one objective and two to three key results usually creates far more focus than a sprawling dashboard nobody acts on.

// GET THIS SKILL — FREE

Use this skill in your AI

Every skill on SkillForge is free. Drop your email and copy this skill straight into Claude, ChatGPT, or any LLM.

We'll email you when new skills drop. Unsubscribe anytime.